'The George Zimmerman Verdict'

'On February 26, 2012 thither was a scene in Sanford, Florida. George Zimmerman quill Trayvon Martin, a 17 year-old African-American boy. Zimmerman was the area watchman at the time. Zimmerman saw Martin in the neighborhood and suasion he looked wary therefore he cal take 911. After the remove call stop Zimmerman and Martin got into a unfounded altercation which led to Zimmerman shooting Martin. This event attracted all the media attention. repayable to a habitual demand Zimmerman was arrested on April 11, 2012. It was a very intense political campaign that motivated the domain to get involved. On July 13, 2013 Zimmerman was found non guilty for the death of Trayvon Martin. This case genuine a capacious outburst from the universal due to the distinct opinions regarding the verdict. An analysis of the manifold editorials written somewhat the verdict shows ii strong sides: adept supporting the verdict and one opposing it.\nOne root on of the verdict is Brian Tannebaum, a criminal falsification truthyer in Florida. Tannebaum urges the popular to empathize the rectitude in front they question it. He argues, The jury didnt let off Zimmerman because they thought he was a true guy or because they werent sad that a young boy was killedthey found him not guilty because the facts and the law required them to do so (Tannebaum). Tannebaums point is that the public must butt their verdict on the evidence given and the Florida laws rather than emotion. He believes that it is important to learn\njustice and attach to the laws, whatever they expertness be. He states, You produce a enigma with that, do something to dislodge the law separate than croak on social media (Tannebaum). Tannebaum sends a message to wad that are wretched with the verdict. He feels that stack should take a stand and do something about the law instead of complain about it on social media. Tannebaum does not condone Zimmermans actions but agrees with the ver dict because the law defends Zimmerman.\n other su... '